DOI: https://doi.org/10.17721/2524-048X.2024.29.2

 

Abstract.

The article examines the formation of the Common Security and Defence Policy of the European Union and the first stage of its development (1999–2016). The legislative framework for European integration in security and defence is analyzed, primarily a number of treaties adopted at the end of the 20th and the beginning of the 21st centuries. It was found that their normative provisions began to be implemented within the framework of the EU CSDP (until 2009 – ECSDP), which was launched in 1999 thanks to the decision of the European Council. The key directions of the EU CSDP at the first stage of its development (1999–2016) were the implementation of peacekeeping operations, the formation of battlegroups, as well as the initiation of joint projects in the field of defence within the framework of the European Defence Agency.

It was concluded that the first two directions carried out at the expense of the capabilities already available in each country, developed most dynamically. From 2003 till 2016, the EU carried out more than 30 peacekeeping operations in different parts of the world, and since 2005, multinational combat groups began to go on duty. However, the effectiveness of the implementation of the CSDP was affected by the lack of a single strategic culture among the participating countries, which led to cases of blocking proposals for peacekeeping operations or the use of EU battlegroups to resolve crises. A serious problem at the first stage was also the lack of joint financing mechanisms for peacekeeping operations and battlegroups, due to which most of their costs were transferred directly to the participating countries. It was revealed that the weakest link during 1999–2016 was the third direction of the CSDP, which related to the joint development of defence capabilities at all stages.

The article concludes that the experience of the first stage of the CSDP was taken into account in the further reform of the EU, in particular, in the process of launching new initiatives during 2017–2022, which brought European defence integration to a new level. It is emphasized that Russia’s invasion of Ukraine proved the need for further reform of the CSDP while simultaneously strengthening the EU’s cooperation with the USA, NATO, and Ukraine.

Keywords: European Union, security, defence, common policy, peacekeeping, battlegroups.

 

Submitted 17.06.2024

---

Download

---

References:

1. Romanova, O. (2016). Myrotvorchi misiii Yevropeiskoho Soiuzu na Balkanah v ramkah Yevropeiskoii polityky bezpeky i oborony (YePBO). Perspektyvy rozvytku suchasnoiii nauky (pp. 106–108). Helvetyka. Retrieved from: https://er.chdtu.edu.ua/bitstream/ChSTU/3391/1/13dec2016-2.pdf#page=106
2. Snihyr, O. (2008). Yevropeiska polityka bezpeky ta oborony: stratehichni aspekty spivpratsi Ukraiiny z YeS – vyznachennia napriamiv ta formatu. Retrieved from: http://web.archive.org/web/20191220010510/http://old.niss.gov.ua/monitor/november/2.htm
3. Stambulskyi sammit NATO: Dovidnyk chytacha (2004). Retrieved from: https://www.nato.int/docu/rdr-gde-ist/rdr-gde-ist-ukr.pdf
4. Clapp, S. (2022). Implementation of the Strategic Compass: Opportunities, challenges and timelines. Retrieved from: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2022/739249/EPRS_STU(2022)739249_EN.pdf
5. Cologne European Council Declaration on the common policy on security and defence (1999). Retrieved from: https://www.cvce.eu/content/publication/2003/6/6/ee393bf3-d96f-46b8-8897-15546a0e1c0d/publishable_en.pdf
6. Consolidated versions of the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty on the functioning of the European Union (2008). Retrieved from: https://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST-6655-2008-INIT/en/pdf
7. Crisis management – framework for participation agreements. EUR–Lex. Retrieved from: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/EN/legal-content/summary/crisis-management-framework-for-participation-agreements.html
8. Dobrescu, M. (2023). Explaining third–country participation in CSDP missions: the case of the association trio – Ukraine, Georgia and Moldova. European Security, 32 (4), 539–557. Retrieved from: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/epdf/10.1080/09662839.2023.2196018?needAccess=true
9. Iso-Markku, T., & Karjalainen, T. (2022). Flexible Defence Cooperation in Europe: FNC, JEF and EI2. Retrieved from: https://www.iai.it/sites/default/files/euidea_pb_6.pdf
10. Joint Declaration on European Defence: Joint Declaration issued at the British–French Summit (1998). Retrieved from: https://www.cvce.eu/content/publication/2008/3/31/f3cd16fb-fc37-4d52-936f-c8e9bc80f24f/publishable_en.pdf
11. Keukeleire, S., & Delreux, T. (2022). The Foreign Policy of the European Union. London: Bloomsbury.
12. Popa, A.-V., & Stefan G.-T. (2019). The (Dis–/)Integration of the EU’s Rapid Response Capabilities: The Case of the EU Battlegroups. Redefining Community in Intercultural Context, 8 (1), 241–251. Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/340934797
13. Missiroli, A. (Ed.). (2016). The EU and the world: players and policies post–Lisbon: A handbook. Luxembourg: Imprimerie Centrale.
14. Treaty of Amsterdam amending the Treaty on European Union, the Treaties establishing the European Communities and certain related Acts (1997). European Communities. Retrieved from: https://treaties.fcdo.gov.uk/data/Library2/pdf/1999-TS0052.pdf
15. Treaty on European Union (1992). Official Journal of the European Communities. Retrieved from: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:11992M/TXT