EU EASTERN ENLARGEMENT IN FRENCH POLICY DURING THE PERIOD OF PRESIDENT FRANÇOIS MITTERRAND

Oleh Mashevskyi,

Dr. habil. (History), Professor,

Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Kyiv, Ukraine

 

Inna Potapova,

Master’s Student,

Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Kyiv, Ukraine

 

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17721/2524-048X.2026.33.8

 

Abstract. The aim of this article is to analyze theoretical developments and practical steps in the EU eastward enlargement among French political circles, in particular the contribution of President François Mitterrand himself to the European integration processes in Eastern Europe in the 1980s and the first half of the 1990s.

Methodology. This is an empirical study based on a critical analysis of official documents (speeches of François Mitterrand, minutes of meetings of the French government, statements of the French Foreign Ministry, reports of the European Commission, the Maastricht Treaty) and private sources (memoirs of French politicians, diplomatic correspondence). The subject of the study is considered in the context of the key events of the end of the Cold War and the formation of a new European security architecture – the transition to the European Union, preparing the ground for its expansion to Central and Eastern Europe and the role of French politics in this process.

The scientific novelty of the study lies in the comprehensive rethinking of the role of French political circles, in particular French President François Mitterrand, in the formation of the theoretical foundations and practical side of the European integration process in Eastern Europe in the late 1980s – in the first half of the 1990s.

Conclusions. The practical implementation of the expansion of the European Communities (EU) to the east during the presidency of François Mitterrand (late 1980s – first half of the 1990s) was a complex and multidimensional process. Against the backdrop of the collapse of the communist bloc, F. Mitterrand proposed the idea of ​​a “European Confederation”. It was supposed to ensure the peaceful transformation of the region, uniting all the states of the continent, but without too rapid enlargement of the EU, offering cooperation with the CEE countries in a broader structure. The project was not implemented for a number of reasons. The countries of Central and Eastern Europe (CEE) began to view the Confederation as a “waiting room” without real guarantees of membership. The idea also did not receive support from Germany and the United States of America. The collapse of the USSR in 1991 made the concept politically irrelevant. After it became clear that the ideas of the Confederation would not be implemented, France adapted its policy, moving to the gradual involvement of the CEE countries in the European integration processes. This included the conclusion of European Association Agreements with the Visegrad Group (1991) and financial assistance programs such as PHARE. In parallel, the institutional deepening of the EU was carried out: the signing of the Maastricht Treaty (1992), which transformed the EEC into the European Union, and the formulation of the Copenhagen Criteria (1993), which defined the conditions for future members. The French strategy made it possible to maintain a balance between deeper integration of Western Europe and expansion to the east. According to the ideas laid down under F. Mitterrand, gradual adaptation became an important basis for the further accession of the CEE countries to the EU in 2004.

Keywords. European Communities, European integration, François Mitterrand, international relations, EU enlargement, foreign policy, Maastricht Treaty.

 

Submitted 03.10.2025


Download


References:

  1. Holovchenko, A. (2011). Polityka rozshyrennia Yevropeiskoho Soiuzu na Skhid yak vidpovid na vyklyk novoho perioda u svitovii istorii pislia zakinchennia kholodnoi viiny. Aktual”ni problemy polityky. (80–86). Feniks. Retrieved from: http://app.nuoua.od.ua/archive/41_2011/11.pdf [In Ukrainian].
  2. Dzhiadt, T. (2020). Pislia viiny: Istoriia Yevropy vid 1945 roku. Kyiv: Nash format. [In Ukrainian].
  3. Kopiika, V., & Shynkarenko, T. (2012). Yevropeiskyi Soiuz: istoriia i zasady funktsionuvannia. Kyiv: Znannia. [In Ukrainian].
  4. Perih, S. (2021). Mistse i rol Frantsii u yevropeiskii intehratsii (1990-ti – 2012 rr.). Kamianets-Podilskyi. [In Ukrainian].
  5. Savka, V. (2017). Osoblyvosti polityky yevropeiskoi intehratsii Slovatskoi Respubliky 1993–2003 rr. Uzhhorod National University. Retrieved from: https://dspace.uzhnu.edu.ua/jspui/handle/lib/16954 [In Ukrainian].
  6. Khaletska, L. (1999). Yevropeiske budivnytstvo v suspilno-politychnii dumtsi Frantsii kintsia 80–90-kh rr. XX st. Visnyk Kyivskoho natsionalnoho universytetu im. T. Shevchenka, 49, 67–73. [In Ukrainian].
  7. Shapovalova, O. (2009). Frantsuzkyi pidkhid do politychnoi intehratsii v Yevropeiskomu Soiuzi. Sotsiolohichni studii, 4. Retrieved from: http://www.socio-journal.kpi.kiev.ua/archive/2009/4/7.pdf [In Ukrainian].
  8. A breakfast that made history. (1988, September 9). Radio Prague International. Retrieved from: https://english.radio.cz/ [In English].
  9. Barre, R., & Geremek, B. (1994, December 9). Integrating the countries of Central Europe. Le Monde, 1. [In English].
  10. Bozo, F. (2005). Mitterrand, la fin de la guerre froide et l’unification allemande. De Yalta à Maastricht. Paris: Odile Jacob. [Іn French].
  11. Bozo, F. (2008). The failure of a grand design: Mitterrand’s European Confederation, 1989–1991. Contemporary European History, 7(3), 391–412. [Іn French].
  12. Central European Free Trade Agreement (CEFTA). (1992, December 21). Centre virtuel de la connaissance sur l’Europe (CVCE). Retrieved from: https://www.cvce.eu/en/obj/central_european_free_trade_agreement_krakow_21_december_1992-en-0b71b87b-bdfd-4a9c-a239-aa64cb337dcc.html [In English].
  13. Chaouad, R. (2013). 1989–1992, Оu la redéfinition des conditions d’existence de la construction européenne. La Revue internationale et stratégique, 91, 103–116 [Іn French].
  14. Cingel, J. (2024). EU enlargement discourse in Slovakia: Supporting it, but better let’s not talk about it. Retrieved from: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1lXLHygXCMvQpJPZzjbhabW9hku9-eG6K/view?usp=sharing [In English].
  15. Conclusions of the Presidency: European Council in Copenhagen, 21–22 June 1993. (1993). European Council. Retrieved from: https://www.consilium.europa.eu/ [In English].
  16. Conférence de presse conjointe de M. François Mitterrand (1990, March 20). Vie-publique.fr. Retrieved from: https://www.vie-publique.fr/ [Іn French].
  17. Daniels, M. (2005). The European Neighbourhood Policy (ENP) and its potential impact on the EU’s conflict prevention policy. Paris: Sciences Po – CERI. Retrieved from: https://www.sciencespo.fr/ [In English].
  18. Deutsch-Französisches Gipfeltreffen in Paris: Helmut Kohl and François Mitterrand. (1990, June 26). eu. Retrieved from: https://www.cvce.eu/ [In English].
  19. Les Élites et la construction de l’Europe au 20e siècle. (n.d.). Encyclopédie d’histoire numérique de l’Europe. Retrieved from: https://ehne.fr/ [Іn French].
  20. Georges, S. (n.d.). François Mitterrand et l’Europe. fr. Retrieved from: https://fresques.ina.fr/ [Іn French].
  21. Gilles, G. (2021). Construction européenne: La révolution d’un continent. Fondation Jean Monnet pour l’Europe. [Іn French].
  22. Gorce, P.-M. (1986). François Mitterrand. Réflexions sur la politique extérieure de la France. Politique étrangère, 1, 305–308 [Іn French].
  23. Grabbe, H. (2006). The EU’s transformative power: Europeanization through conditionality in Central and Eastern Europe. London: Palgrave Macmillan. [In English].
  24. Hartnell, H. (1993). Association agreements between the EC and Central and Eastern European states. Acta Juridica Hungarica, 35, 225–236 [In English].
  25. Interview with Élisabeth Guigou (Video). (2008, September 29). eu. Retrieved from: https://www.cvce.eu/ [Іn French].
  26. Jacoby, W. (2004). The enlargement of the European Union and NATO: Ordering from the menu in Central Europe. Cambridge University Press [In English].
  27. Karolewski, I.P. (2018). Poland and the European Union. Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/ [In English].
  28. Lequesne, Ch. (2007). La France et l’élargissement de l’Union européenne: la difficulté à s’adapter à de nouveaux objectifs. Questions internationales, 25, 84–86 [Іn French].
  29. Macron, E. (2022, May 9). Speech by Emmanuel Macron at the closing ceremony of the Conference on the Future of Europe. Retrieved from: https://lv.ambafrance.org/ [In English].
  30. Mateusz Piotr, G. (2024). 1989 in Poland (Up to the June Elections) in the journalism of Le Monde. Historia i Polityka, 50(57), 101–123. [In English].
  31. Meciar, V. (1995, June 27). Demande d’adhésion de la République slovaque à l’Union européenne. Council of the EU. Retrieved from: https://www.cvce.eu/ [Іn French].
  32. Meisel, S. (2014). Experience of Hungary’s association agreement. In Developing trade and trade policy relations with the European Union (pp. 67–83). Budapest: Institute of World Economics. [In English].
  33. Mitterrand, F. (1991, June 12). Interview à Radio France internationale. Vie-publique.fr. Retrieved from: https://www.vie-publique.fr/ [Іn French].
  34. Mitterrand, F. (1989). Débats du Parlement européen (22 novembre). eu. Retrieved from: https://www.cvce.eu/ [Іn French].
  35. Pridham, G. (2005). Designing democracy: EU enlargement and regime change in postcommunist Europe. Palgrave Macmillan. [In English].
  36. Šlosarčík, I. (2011). The Czech Republic – impacts of and experience with EU membership. Eastern Journal of European Studies, 2(2), 21–30. [In English].
  37. Vachudova, M. A. (2005). Europe undivided: Democracy, leverage, and integration after communism. Oxford University Press. [In English].
  38. Védrine, H. (1998, May 7). Interview accordée à «Rheinischer Merkur». Vie-publique.fr. Retrieved from: https://www.vie-publique.fr/ [Іn French].