Valerii Pavlenko,
Ph.D. (History), Professor,
Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Kyiv, Ukraine
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17721/2524-048X.2025.31.9
Abstract.
The purpose of the article is to study the approaches used by the government of the United Kingdom in pursuing its European policy in the 50s – early 60s of the twentieth century and to determine the positions on this issue in the Conservative and Labour parties. In addition, to analyse the policy of the British government regarding the country’s joining the EEC. The research methodology is based on the principle of historicism. The author uses analytical, chronological, and historical-comparative methods. The scientific novelty lies in the fact that this research, to a certain extent, fills a gap in the academic literature and is an attempt to analyse the evolution of approaches to London’s European policy in the 50s – early 60s of the twentieth century, to systematise the main approaches of the British government to European integration, based on archival documents, the press, and little-studied historiographical research.
Conclusions. In the 50s – early 60s of the twentieth century, the United Kingdom was in the process of finding its new role in Europe, experiencing a change in status from an empire to a country that was gradually becoming an ordinary European state, whose main goal was to create favourable international conditions for security and domestic prosperity. At this time, Britain was significantly changing its European policy, and this suggests that London, to a certain extent, is moving away from political traditions and making more realistic steps. During these years, the British made their first attempt to join the Common Market. There is no doubt that the course of joining the EEC was a new form of foreign policy for the country, which would ensure the promotion of British interests. However, this policy of the Conservative cabinet was aimed at changing tactics, not strategy. This was one of the reasons why the Foreign Office and Macmillan personally made a series of mistakes that prevented London from entering the “Common Market” on its first attempt. A decisive factor in the failure of Britain’s joining the EEC was that the country imposed some special conditions on the UK’s membership, which led to difficult and protracted negotiations. In addition, the cautious and compromising approach of the Conservative cabinet in the middle of the country allowed anti-British forces in the EEC to prevent the British from joining the Common Market in 1963. The research shows that the formation of the United Kingdom’s European policy was influenced by both internal factors, such as intra- and inter-party struggles, and an external factor caused by the fact that France and Germany did not show the political will to allow Britain to join the Common Market.
Keywords: Great Britain, integration, European politics, Common Market, International Relations, European security.
Submitted 15.02.2025
Download
References:
- George, S. (1991). Britain and European integration since 1945. Oxford Academic.
- Macmillan, H. (1969). Tides of fortune: 1945 – 1955.
- Ellison, J. (1996). Perfidious Albion? Britain, Plan G and European integration, 1955–1956. Contemporary British History, 10 (4), 1–34.
- Louis, R., & Bull, H. (Eds.). (1986). The special relationship. Anglo-American relations since 1945. Clarendon Press.
- Horne, A. (1986). The Macmillan Years and afterwards. In The special relationship. Anglo-American relations since 1945 (pp. 87–102). Clarendon Press.
- Kaiser, W. (1993). To join, or not to join: the «Appeasement» policy of Britain’s first EEC application. In From reconstruction to Integration: Britain and Europe since 1945 (pp. 144–156) Leicester University Press.
- George, S. (1998). An Awkward Partner: Britain in the European Community. Oxford University Press.
- The Washington Post. (1960, March 30).
- Macmillan, H. (1972). Pointing the Way, 1959 – 1961. New York: Harper and Row.
- Lieber, R. (1970). British Politics and European Unity: Parties, Elites, and Pressure Groups. University of California Press.
- Beloff, N. (1973). Transit of Britain. Harper Collins Distribution Services.
- House of Commons (1961). Parliamentary debates, (Vol. 640).
- Butler, L. (1993). Winds of Change: Britain, Europe and the Commonwealth, 1959 – 1961. In From reconstruction to integration. (pp. 157–165) Pinter.
- House of Lords (1961). Parliamentary debates, Vol. 645, cols. 1421–1423.
- The Times (1962, October 8).
- The Times (1962, October 11).
- The Times (1962, October 12).
- TheWashington Post (1960, March 16).
- Ludlow, N.P. (1997). Dealing with Britain. The Six and the First UK Application to the EEC. Cambridge University Press.
- Brown, G. (1972). In My Way. Penguin Books.
- Porter, B. (1987). Britain, Europe and the World 1850 – 1982. Delusions of Grandeur.
- Milward, A. (2002). The rise and fall of a National Strategy 1945 –1963. Frank Cass Publishers.
- Young, J. (1997). Britain and the World in the Twentieth Century. Bloomsbury Academic.