Tetiana Perga
Ph.D. (History), Senior Researcher, State Institution “Institute of World History of NAS of Ukraine”, Kyiv
UDC 94:502.6+327(061.1ЄС)
DOI http://doi.org/10.17721/2524-048X.2019.13.51-66
Abstract
The article explores the reasons, directions and stages of the wildlife conservation activities which is an important direction of European environmental policy. Author examines the essence of the concept “wilderness” which is used in the official documents of the European Union and EU member states. It has concluded that wilderness is understood as a territory regulated by natural processes, consisting of natural habitats and species, sufficient for the effective ecological functioning of natural processes; it is unchanged or slightly modified and does not undergo changes from the side people, settlements, and infrastructure; its landscape has not undergone any visual changes. The policy of the EU member states concerning the formation of the relevant legislation and practical steps for the creation of protected areas of wildlife are analyzed. It was found that unlike the USA, where in the late nineteenth century the protection of wildlife has stimulated the development of environmental policy, in European Union activities in this area began to develop in the last third of the twentieth century. It was seen as one of the directions of biodiversity conservation within the framework of the regional environmental protection policy. The author concluded that the peculiarity of the European wildlife protection model is the formation of strategic guidelines and development them by the member states in accordance with their national specifics. This leads to a variety of approaches to activities in this the protection of the wildlife. The main disadvantages of the Ukrainian legislation on wildlife conservation as well as problems for its development are revealed. The article state that at the moment, Ukraine has done the first step in the wildlife protection – in 2017, the Law on the protection of virgin forests was adopted. It is concluded that Ukraine’s move to European integration requires not only the adaptation of the national environmental legislation to EU legal norms but also the development of wildlife conservation activities as an important direction of environmental policy.
Key words
EU, wildlife, biodiversity, ecological policy, Ukraine.
Download the аrticle
References
1. Borejko, V. (2018). Wildlife Conservation in Ukraine and the World. Kyiv: Logos. Kyiv: Logos.
2. Pro vnesennia zmin do dejzkih zakonodavchih aktiv Ykrajinu vidnosno ohoroni pralisiv zgidno do Rankivoj konvencii pro ohorony ta stalij rozvitok Karpat (2017). Verhovna Rada. Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/.
3. A Working Definition of European Wilderness and Wild Areas (2013). Europark Federation. Retrieved from https://www.europarc.org/.
4. Current use of the Wild Europe definition of wilderness (2017). Wild Europe. Retrieved from https://www.wildeurope.org/.
5. European Parliament resolution of 3 February 2009 on Wilderness in Europe (2009). European Parliament. Retrieved from http://www.europarl.europa.eu/.
6. Farjon, H. (2014) Citizens’ images and values of nature in Europe. A survey in nine EU Member States. Hague: PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency.
7. Guidelines on Wilderness in Natura 2000 (2013). Brussels: European Union.
8. Martin, V.G. (2008). Wilderness Momentum in Europe. International Journal of Wilderness,14 (2), рр. 34-43.
9. The EU Biodiversity Strategy to 2020 (2010). European Commission. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/.
10. Towards a Wilder Europe. Developing an action agenda for wilderness and large habitat areas (2010). European Commission. Retrieved from https://www.europarc.org/.
11. Wilderness in Europe. Report. Explanatory (2008). European Parliament. Retrieved from http://www.europarl.europa.eu/.
12. Wilderness register and indicator for Europe (2013). European Commission. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/ .